Building Trust in US Elections: The Critical Role of Monitoring for Election Misinformation

Misinformation poses a significant threat to the integrity of democratic elections, undermining public trust and sowing division. Trust and safety organizations play a crucial role in monitoring online content to uphold the credibility of election results.

By looking at how misinformation has been tackled in countries like Brazil and the Philippines, valuable insights can be gained to help safeguard US elections.

Brazil's 2022 Presidential Election

In the lead-up to Brazil's 2022 presidential election, the spread of misinformation regarding electoral fraud reached alarming levels. Trust and safety teams at social media platforms worked closely with Brazilian authorities to tackle misleading narratives that could undermine trust in the election process. Platforms like WhatsApp and Facebook implemented stricter content moderation rules, increased fact-checking efforts, and established partnerships with local fact-checking organizations such as Agência Lupa, one of the first independent fact-checking agencies in Brazil, which is also certified by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN).

A critical measure was the limitation of message forwarding on WhatsApp to curb the spread of viral misinformation. By controlling the distribution of misleading content and enhancing the visibility of verified information, trust and safety teams were able to mitigate the impact of false narratives on voter perceptions.

The US can learn from Brazil's experience by continuing to foster collaboration between platforms, independent fact-checkers, and government agencies to limit the spread of false information about election integrity.

The Philippines' 2022 General Election

During the Philippines' 2022 general election, misinformation campaigns targeted both candidates and the electoral process itself, augmenting public distrust. Trust and safety organizations, alongside civil society groups, played a key role in addressing these challenges. Meta increased its focus on detecting coordinated inauthentic behavior—where fake accounts or networks intentionally spread divisive and false content to undermine democratic processes. YouTube also partnered with media organizations such as Rappler, GMA News, and ABS-CBN News to promote authoritative content and prevent misinformation from gaining traction.

These efforts, combined with increased user education about misinformation tactics, helped reduce the influence of false narratives. A key takeaway is that empowering users to recognize and report false content, alongside proactive monitoring, can be effective in limiting misinformation's reach.

‍

Platforms can educate and empower users by creating dedicated resources and educational hubs. For instance, Meta often establishes an "Election Information Center" that provides verified information, voting guides, and resources to help users identify misinformation. Platforms like YouTube and Twitter also display banners and information panels to direct users to trusted sources. By providing clear and accessible educational materials, these platforms help users make informed decisions and play an active role in maintaining election integrity.

For the US, similar strategies could be employed by promoting authoritative election information and fostering digital literacy. For instance, platforms could partner with organizations like the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) to promote their "Trusted Info 2024" campaign, which directs users to official state election websites for accurate information. Trust and safety organizations should actively collaborate with credible sources like NASS and established fact-checking groups to counter misinformation before it spreads widely.

The 2020 US Presidential Election

The 2020 US election saw a massive wave of misinformation, much of it aimed at discrediting mail-in voting and casting doubt on the validity of the results. Social media platforms and trust and safety teams were proactive in labeling misleading content, reducing the visibility of false claims, and directing users to reliable information. Twitter, for example, implemented warning labels on tweets that contained unverified or misleading claims about election integrity, while Google directed users to accurate information panels when election-related searches were conducted.

‍

This approach demonstrated the importance of rapid response and clear communication. By providing users with context and directing them to trusted sources, platforms helped reduce the influence of misinformation during a critical period.

Key Takeaways

These case studies illustrate that building trust in elections requires a robust strategy to monitor and counteract misinformation:

As seen in Brazil, trust and safety organizations should work closely with both government agencies and local fact-checkers. This collaboration helps to identify emerging misinformation trends and allows platforms to act quickly to mitigate them.

The Philippines’ election highlighted the importance of educating users to identify false content. In the US, enhancing public awareness of misinformation tactics can make users more discerning, thereby reducing the spread of harmful narratives.

During the 2020 US election, platforms demonstrated that rapid action and transparency in content moderation are essential. Proactively labeling misleading content and directing users to reliable information can go a long way in maintaining public trust.

Effective monitoring by trust and safety organizations is crucial for building and maintaining trust in US elections. By addressing misinformation swiftly and transparently, and by fostering collaboration and public education, trust and safety teams can help ensure that the democratic process remains credible and resilient in the face of evolving digital threats.

‍